> On March 8, 2017, 8:43 p.m., Greg Mann wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/jwt.cpp > > Lines 37 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56667/diff/7-8/?file=1658327#file1658327line37> > > > > Should the 3 helpers here be either enclosed in an anonymous namespace > > or decorated with `static`?
I haven't found a widely adopted practive in the Mesos source base. I'd recommand enclosing the helpers in an anonymous namespace, to better distinguish them from static functions that are used as callbacks for C-APIs and just go ahead an implement it that way. - Jan ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56667/#review168328 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 9, 2017, 3:47 p.m., Jan Schlicht wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/56667/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 9, 2017, 3:47 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas and Greg Mann. > > > Bugs: MESOS-7001 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7001 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > JSON Web Tokens can be used to create claim-based access tokens and is > typically used for HTTP authentication. > This implementation is intended for internal use, e.g. Mesos is supposed > to only parse tokens that it also created. It doesn't fully comply with > RFC 7519. Currently the only supported cryptographic algorithm is HMAC > with SHA-256. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/Makefile.am 75386184108214e67a58c328258ec204099d638c > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/jwt.hpp PRE-CREATION > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/jwt.cpp PRE-CREATION > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/jwt_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56667/diff/9/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Jan Schlicht > >