-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58013/#review170443
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




After double-checking what these flags actually do, I'm going to
add some more information to the commit description:
```
The `/Zc:inline` flag tells the compiler to generate object files
but exclude symbols that are either unreferenced or have internal
linkage only.  This leads to smaller object files and faster linking.
See: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn642448.aspx

The `/debug:FASTLINK` flag changes how the linker generates
program database files (PDB).  Instead of making a full copy of any
related debug information used by the library, this option instead
creates indexes to other PDBs, thereby cutting down on link-time
code generation.  This only affects DEBUG builds.
See: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xe4t6fc1.aspx
```

- Joseph Wu


On March 28, 2017, 5:55 p.m., Jeff Coffler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58013/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 28, 2017, 5:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrew Schwartzmeyer, John Kordich, Joseph Wu, and 
> Li Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7226
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7226
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When working on precompiled headers, we recognized that adding
> some compile/link flags resulted in a 20% reduction in incremental
> linkage time. This is NOT directly dependent on precompiled headers
> (the improvement comes regardless of PCH).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   cmake/CompilationConfigure.cmake 5936be07557395ad08b06aa376b5a29f9b11c143 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58013/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Testing done at end of chain
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeff Coffler
> 
>

Reply via email to