----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/#review174722 -----------------------------------------------------------
Couple more nits, then we can ship-it CHANGELOG Line 52 (original), 52 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/#comment247939> Still mixing `> 1.0` and `pre-1.0`, so either `s/pre-1.0/0.x/g` or `s/pre-1.0/< 1.0/` or `s/> 1.0/1.1+/` docs/upgrades.md Line 278 (original), 278 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/#comment247940> Ditto on `> 1.0` and `pre-1.0`. docs/upgrades.md Lines 50 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/#comment247941> Should we add the same thing to 1.2.x (with a special note that it only applies to `1.2.1+`)? - Adam B On May 11, 2017, 12:47 p.m., Neil Conway wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 11, 2017, 12:47 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Adam B. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Documented that Mesos 1.3.0, 1.2.1 don't allow old agents to register. > > > Diffs > ----- > > CHANGELOG 31c21e9a69a6e11429b58a7eddecf7746a284530 > docs/upgrades.md 74e74642b411eefb737d575b89a1f206cae62b46 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/diff/3/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Visual inspection, no functional change. > > > Thanks, > > Neil Conway > >
