> On May 16, 2017, 10:27 p.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> > I personally don't like using an RC version. We should update protobuf to 
> > an official release, say 3.3.1?

IIRC the rc2 tar was what's available when I looked at the download page. It 
seems like they have fixed the symlink, so I can download this one more time 
and get it updated, although I don't expect any difference.

For version, 3.3.x was not yet available when we looked at this. Now that it's 
out, I'm personall okay if we want to go with latest, although it seems like 
all issues between 3.2 and 3.3 is not critical to us?


- Zhitao


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58358/#review175168
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 25, 2017, 10:51 p.m., Zhitao Li wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58358/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 25, 2017, 10:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7228
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7228
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The content of `3rdparty/protobuf-3.2.0.tar.gz` is generated by:
> - On a Mac OS, download and untar protobuf v3.2.0 source at
>   https://github.com/google/protobuf/archive/v3.2.0rc2.tar.gz;
> - Run `./autogen.sh`;
> - Recompress and tar by `tar -czvf`.
> 
> Note that reviewboard seems to have problem for uploading/dowloading binary 
> patches, so this particular commit is also available at 
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/208
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/protobuf-2.6.1.tar.gz e1c2d541c1eb806e837ff5d1e9d3fdb678b40e06 
>   3rdparty/protobuf-3.2.0.tar.gz PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58358/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1. make check;
> 2. used the modified `test-upgrade.py` in r/58357 to test upgrade/downgrade 
> between this chain and Mesos 1.2;
> 3. build this branch in Apache Aurora's vagrant based box, and verifies that 
> Aurora scheduler (using java) and executor (using python) still works with 
> `libmesos.so` built from this branch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Zhitao Li
> 
>

Reply via email to