> On June 8, 2017, 4:33 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > src/checks/health_checker.cpp > > Lines 298-300 (original), 343-345 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59873/diff/2/?file=1744181#file1744181line404> > > > > Here we should probably print `consecutiveFailures`, because a health > > check may fail consecutively for various reasons.
We already print `consecutiveFailures`, see line 345 =) - Gastón ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59873/#review177306 ----------------------------------------------------------- On June 7, 2017, 11:56 p.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/59873/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 7, 2017, 11:56 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-7092 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7092 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > `HealthChecker` now wraps a `CheckerProcess` and gets check status > updates via a callback. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/checks/checker.cpp dcc3164f3b623de73bacf024ede95b40c48f7192 > src/checks/checker_process.hpp PRE-CREATION > src/checks/checker_process.cpp PRE-CREATION > src/checks/health_checker.hpp 25bf7e99bf5982fd7a6ff5012c231ff89fb7cb39 > src/checks/health_checker.cpp 9d8c8471caa05af3908d34315dbfed08a343c0f8 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59873/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tests still pass on GNU/Linux. > > > Thanks, > > Gastón Kleiman > >
