> On Aug. 14, 2017, 6:45 p.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote:
> > src/launcher/default_executor.cpp
> > Line 233 (original), 233 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61573/diff/2/?file=1796672#file1796672line233>
> >
> >     shouldn't we also pass the `event.kill().kill_policy()`? It allows 
> > frameworks/operators to override the kill policy, see: 
> > https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/628d6609b6eeb90767e5799d0177bfe4828d71aa/include/mesos/executor/executor.proto#L96-L106
> 
> Gastón Kleiman wrote:
>     Droppping the issue, I just noticed that the commit message says that 
> this doesn't include support for kill policies.

Yeah, we still need to add support for `KillPolicy` later. Hopefully, it should 
be trivial after this change (still would need an additional test)

I had added this information to the review description already:
```Note that support for kill
policies still needs to be done instead of using a constant grace
period.```


- Anand


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61573/#review182888
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 14, 2017, 5:19 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61573/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 14, 2017, 5:19 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7879
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7879
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This modifies the default executor to perform signal escalation
> via the 'KILL_NESTED_CONTAINER' call i.e., send a SIGTERM followed
> by a SIGKILL after some grace period. Note that support for kill
> policies still needs to be done instead of using a constant grace
> period.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/default_executor.cpp c25cc941eefc0cca998a99d76497bfdd05babe92 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61573/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>

Reply via email to