> On Aug. 9, 2017, 5:30 p.m., Avinash sridharan wrote:
> > docs/health-checks.md
> > Lines 204 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61434/diff/1/?file=1789488#file1789488line204>
> >
> >     I think we also need to mention that the expectation here is that task 
> > is listening on the `loopback` interface along with any other routeable 
> > interface to which it might be listening.

Good idea.


> On Aug. 9, 2017, 5:30 p.m., Avinash sridharan wrote:
> > docs/health-checks.md
> > Line 265 (original), 494 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61434/diff/1/?file=1789488#file1789488line517>
> >
> >     Why do we need to share the `mnt` namespace? This is already done by 
> > the executor for `MesosContainerizer` so why does the `checker` need to do 
> > this if it is running as part of the executor?

Nope, not for the command executor case when `rootfs` is specified.


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61434/#review182495
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 11, 2017, 12:12 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61434/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 11, 2017, 12:12 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman, Greg Mann, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7349
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7349
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/health-checks.md d0749347d1f9398004e56b03503d655b5fba75f4 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61434/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> https://gist.github.com/rukletsov/517a136cb6a0e8b909db30b36b13eded
> 
> Additionally rendered in MacDown.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to