-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63887/#review191331
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/containerizer/composing.cpp
Lines 382-384 (original), 386-389 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63887/#comment269142>

    Update this comment.



src/slave/containerizer/composing.cpp
Lines 389 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63887/#comment269143>

    Can't you simply pass `ContainerTermination` to `set()`?



src/slave/containerizer/composing.cpp
Lines 615-617 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63887/#comment269149>

    Note that it is safe to call `_destroy()` multiple times (this can happen).



src/slave/containerizer/composing.cpp
Lines 634-638 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63887/#comment269150>

    `return future->isSome() ? true : false;`



src/slave/containerizer/composing.cpp
Line 641 (original), 646-648 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63887/#comment269152>

    Let's keep somehting simialr to the original comment here, explaining that 
if `termination` is already set in `_launch()`, `associate()` is a no-op and 
this is intended.


- Alexander Rukletsov


On Nov. 16, 2017, 8:42 p.m., Andrei Budnik wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63887/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 16, 2017, 8:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Gilbert Song, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7506
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7506
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously, `wait()` and `destroy()` methods of composing containerizer
> returned a future that might be set to `READY` state while the internal
> state of composing containerizer is not yet cleaned up.
> 
> This patch adds a `termination` promise to `Container` struct,
> which is used to return a future from `wait()` and `destroy()` methods.
> This promise is set to `READY` state iff related container is
> completely destroyed.
> `_destroy()` callback is subscribed for a future from `wait()`, which is
> called on related containerizer, to propagate a value to the
> `termination` promise and do the cleanup.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/composing.cpp 
> 64919ef1e61a984956c2280ae6b1890c4d135ad1 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63887/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> internal CI
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Budnik
> 
>

Reply via email to