> On Nov. 22, 2017, 7:05 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > Should we be implementing a += overload against 
> > `RepeatedPtrField<Resource>` instead of doing this? Would that be more 
> > efficient than doing a conversion then adding? I'm also hoping to avoid 
> > code having to this type of conversion, ideally :)
> 
> Dmitry Zhuk wrote:
>     There's definitely some room for improvements in `Resources`, and `+=` 
> overload could save some CPU cycles, but not in this case. It will not be as 
> efficient here as having explicit conversion followed by more than one 
> `+=`/`<<`. In current approach we don't trust data in protobuf, and we must 
> do validation (see `Resources::operator+=(const Resource_& that)`, invoked 
> from `Resources(const RepeatedPtrField<Resource>&)`). So in
>     ```
>     const Resources r = ...;
>     r1 += r;
>     r2 += r;
>     ```
>     we do validation only once during conversion, and `+=(const Resources&)` 
> bypasses validation since `Resources` are known to be valid.
>     However `+=(const RepeatedPtrField<Resource>&)` overload will have to do 
> validatation on each call, so we will validate data twice.

Ah yes, thanks for the clarification! Can you mention this in the description 
and the code?

Also, if there was a performance impact on the benchmark, could you include it 
for posterity?


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64028/#review191755
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 22, 2017, 1:24 p.m., Dmitry Zhuk wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64028/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 22, 2017, 1:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> `RepeatedPtrField<Resource>` can be implicitly converted to `Resources`,
> leading to hidden multiple resources conversions on performance-critical
> paths in master. For example, `operator +=` relies on implicit
> conversion, when invoked with `RepeatedPtrField<Resource>` argument.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp 2a2e830354db4a2191fb8321beb8174b80f7ba7d 
>   src/master/master.cpp 7417b5d641fd4bb6d91cb0e6456c60201bbc8206 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64028/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmitry Zhuk
> 
>

Reply via email to