-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64423/#review193150
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/master.cpp
Lines 7200 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64423/#comment271653>

    no need for this check if it's a required field



src/master/master.cpp
Lines 7207-7208 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64423/#comment271654>

    Ditto. let's make it a required field



src/master/master.cpp
Lines 7204-7207 (original), 7223-7226 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64423/#comment271659>

    This probably need some adjustment given that message.offer_operations will 
be for agent default resources and `slave->offerOperations` will be for all RPs?



src/master/master.cpp
Line 7306 (original), 7341 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64423/#comment271663>

    i was expecting that message.offer_operations is only for agent default 
resources.
    
    Any resource provider resources should go to the corresponding resource 
provider struct..



src/slave/slave.cpp
Lines 6800 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64423/#comment271664>

    Let's use `previousOversubscribedResources` here to be more explicit



src/slave/slave.cpp
Lines 6850 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64423/#comment271660>

    fix style issue


- Jie Yu


On Dec. 7, 2017, 5:49 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64423/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 7, 2017, 5:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch changes the way resource-provider related information is
> passed. Instead of aggregating all information from both the agent and
> resource providers into global per-agent lists in
> `UpdateSlaveMessage`, with this patch we pass resource-provider
> related information explicitly. We can in a subsequent patch surface
> this information in e.g., the operator API.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp 2658312b0d10a72fefda68c7d3137b94afbd8249 
>   src/master/master.cpp 2fd66c072e9a194680d7653c664bd8a68ea1d2f0 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp fc762fb1e8aeb57b0d7ad551d960ec4be06e8e33 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp dd830d93f8a08720231e3d4a6421f7a058ba6093 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp 25cfd4730c3d77d1886745204b13ca3cb140620c 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64423/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to