-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64658/#review194084
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/resource_provider/storage/provider.cpp
Lines 897-912 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64658/#comment272806>

    Looks like this is not needed to me?



src/resource_provider/storage/provider.cpp
Lines 1153 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64658/#comment272809>

    what if `watch` failed? at least print some error message?



src/resource_provider/storage/provider.cpp
Lines 1250 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64658/#comment272813>

    Looks like this function can be called in any state?



src/resource_provider/storage/provider.cpp
Lines 1266 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64658/#comment272815>

    remove the extra space before `=`



src/resource_provider/storage/provider.cpp
Lines 2587-2588 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64658/#comment272819>

    Maybe we need a helper here?
    
    `Result<string> getDiskProfile(const Resource& resource)`


- Jie Yu


On Dec. 18, 2017, 2:25 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64658/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 18, 2017, 2:25 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This changes the Storage Local Resource Provider's source of profile
> information from only using the default to using a VolumeProfileAdaptor
> module.
> 
> This patch is based on https://reviews.apache.org/r/64616.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/resource_provider/storage/provider.cpp 
> 158b6b408002209aa9a79a6772da30c984aad61a 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64658/diff/6/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See later in chain. This patch will fail SLRP tests. They are fixed in a 
> followup patch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao
> 
>

Reply via email to