-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/#review197144
-----------------------------------------------------------



FAIL: Failed to apply the current review.

Failed command: `python.exe .\support\apply-reviews.py -n -r 52064`

All the build artifacts available at: 
http://dcos-win.westus.cloudapp.azure.com/mesos-build/review/52064

Relevant logs:

- 
[apply-review-52064-stdout.log](http://dcos-win.westus.cloudapp.azure.com/mesos-build/review/52064/logs/apply-review-52064-stdout.log):

```
error: patch failed: site/data/releases.yml:154
error: site/data/releases.yml: patch does not apply
```

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On Feb. 9, 2018, 1:46 a.m., Tim Anderegg wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 9, 2018, 1:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, haosdent huang and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3011
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3011
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Support for multiple versions of docs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   site/Gemfile 877fe914a9787c140848fdf9958571fec5fa58ff 
>   site/Gemfile.lock 909f3f3badeaa47c80929e243ce36307766edee4 
>   site/Rakefile 31ef6ffe225ce7ddc573054058af1070b9e96b09 
>   site/config.rb 04bc7aa1e0ac61ce5d89fd53d32f265532996913 
>   site/data/releases.yml e3edc308a5429585b3fc3f05564d695ba3217035 
>   site/source/assets/js/versions.js PRE-CREATION 
>   site/source/layouts/basic.erb 8a07488940f3793d6fdd291dbe896e098f321c96 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/diff/6/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Testing was done manually to verify that the documentation was built for each 
> version of Mesos that is supported (some older versions do not have 
> compatible documentation).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tim Anderegg
> 
>

Reply via email to