> On March 20, 2018, 3:59 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/grpc.hpp
> > Lines 67 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66158/diff/1/?file=1982691#file1982691line67>
> >
> >     nit: Let's make this constructor `explicit`. I think it would also make 
> > sense to take the `shared_ptr` by value, and then move into member,
> >     
> >         explicit Channel(shared_ptr<Channel> _channel)
> >           : channel(std::move(_channel)) {}

Does it make sense to have the following instead?
```
explicit Channel(shared_ptr<Channel>&& _channel)
  : channel(std::move(_channel)) {}
```


- Chun-Hung


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66158/#review199556
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 20, 2018, 12:59 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66158/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 20, 2018, 12:59 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrew Schwartzmeyer, Benjamin Bannier, Jie Yu, and 
> Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8697
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8697
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The `GRPCClientTest.*` tests now uses in-process channels instead of
> Unix domain sockets, except for `DiscardedBeforeServerStarted`, which is
> disabled on Windowns for now.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/grpc.hpp 
> edaf0410c62454df53d06957a4a8f1f6027b00bb 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/grpc_tests.cpp 
> 8bb517fb5659b7010a0fe8b7b90ebb3a5c9f1157 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66158/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> NOTE: This is not tested on Windows yet. The CMake rules are added later in 
> the chain.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao
> 
>

Reply via email to