-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66621/#review201536
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [66621]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' 
CONFIGURATION='--verbose --disable-libtool-wrappers' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 
MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker-build.sh

- Mesos Reviewbot


On April 16, 2018, 9 p.m., Clément Michaud wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66621/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 16, 2018, 9 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8788
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8788
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add support for alg RS256 to JWT library.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/jwt.hpp 
> 768cbf6fa91537ff9f45f236f4033097c5cea959 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/ssl/utilities.hpp 
> b7cc31c33fd35c93754407f8b350eeb993177f1d 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/jwt.cpp 921031e6fe3ced5a6be6bc96190fae6d8282ae26 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/ssl/utilities.cpp 
> 4d3727daf53ec62a19255da5a9804d342e770ec2 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/jwt_keys.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/jwt_tests.cpp 
> eb36a9aed3b11208c7cdc6f20b5347f46821a207 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66621/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> I added the same tests than the ones for HS256 (i.e., validation in following 
> cases: bad header, bad payload, unknown alg, unsupported alg, valid token 
> etc.. and creation of a valid token). I also added a test to verify that the 
> validation of a RS256 token fails when using the wrong public key.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Clément Michaud
> 
>

Reply via email to