-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68304/#review207255
-----------------------------------------------------------



Per offline conversation, seems like we could simplify this by modeling as:

```
MIN, MIN + factor*2^N
```


src/slave/slave.cpp
Lines 1287-1290 (original), 1286-1289 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68304/#comment290587>

    Shouldn't we specialize this between authentication and registration?


- Benjamin Mahler


On Aug. 14, 2018, 5:33 a.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68304/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 14, 2018, 5:33 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Gastón Kleiman.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9147
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9147
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch fixed the backoff time calculation
> overflow bug described in MESOS-9147.
> 
> The old approach times out an authentication request after
> 5s and then retries after some backoff time. This is not
> optimal because, if the agent is going to backoff some time
> before retry, we might as well wait that long for the
> previous authentication request (instead of timeout early).
> 
> This patch combines the authentication timeout and
> authentication retry backoff interval into a single
> wait time interval. Now agent will timeout the previous
> authentication request after the wait time interval and
> then immediately retry.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/constants.hpp 0bd9f371ca24df66055f31bca0d57625dc7642d9 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 802d4eb9e9eba2f1175dd85e56dcc80a61e32f74 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 78e8666f402be58af5b6e20a715da4998af2615c 
>   src/tests/authentication_tests.cpp c9a8f85951a50e278ae509f4efa7105755015ce9 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68304/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Meng Zhu
> 
>

Reply via email to