----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68426/#review207602 -----------------------------------------------------------
Patch looks great! Reviews applied: [68426] Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' CONFIGURATION='--verbose --disable-libtool-wrappers' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker-build.sh - Mesos Reviewbot On Aug. 20, 2018, 4:46 a.m., Jie Yu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/68426/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 20, 2018, 4:46 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler, Gilbert Song, and James Peach. > > > Bugs: MESOS-8418 and MESOS-9081 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8418 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9081 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Prior to this patch, some of the cgroups helpers call `cgroups::verify` > to make sure the hierarchy and cgroup are valid. This causes some > performance issues for the agent because `cgroups::verify` will read the > entire mount table, and mount table read is expensive if the mount table > is large. See more details in MESOS-8418. > > In most of the cases, the verification has already been done when those > cgroups helpers are called. Therefore, it is better to let the caller do > the verification and make those cgroups helpers pure helpers. > > Also, the verification is subject to race anyway. The cgroups global > state might change (e.g., operators modify the cgroups) after the > verification is done, making the verification itself not that super > useful. > > This patch refactored the cgroups helpers and moved the verifications to > the callers. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/linux/cgroups.hpp 282b8e783e8c70742e4388a19003382bc57db8d5 > src/linux/cgroups.cpp 86b0306eee804732a55041d2d82c14db35ec5095 > src/linux/systemd.cpp 2444ff4e432e61071c62e8e1ee94d62ac6b96c88 > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/cgroups.cpp > 1444c0543540cf61e253579e9e49d8687bd4ed3a > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/subsystems/cpu.cpp > 321671f18b72edec1f8ed00f0069b539a698c4af > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/gpu/isolator.cpp > d84f78c99eb118eba1a5bc3e74a2cf57556a325a > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/linux_launcher.cpp > e51352af12743cc35f09b9fbb7d770f0108f908c > src/slave/main.cpp 489e87522588be259d382f588b66907ba29f1788 > src/tests/containerizer/nested_mesos_containerizer_tests.cpp > b80e40b6f4b18e076ebb3c1668f475286c337127 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68426/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > sudo make check > > I also used the benchmark I developed in https://reviews.apache.org/r/68266/ > to see the speedup > > Before the patch > Took 56.xxx secs to launch 1000 containers > Took 55.xxx secs to destroy 1000 containers > > After the patch > Took 37.xxx secs to launch 1000 containers > Took 26.xxx secs to destroy 1000 containers > > > Thanks, > > Jie Yu > >