> On Aug. 18, 2018, 12:34 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.cpp
> > Lines 7684-7690 (original)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68362/diff/4/?file=2074583#file2074583line7684>
> >
> >     Where do we update the operations and total resources?

The `if` statement removed here was for the case where a resource provider was 
unknown when the `UPDATE_STATE` was received. This is not possible anymore as 
we always inform the master a resource provider subscribes.

The code handling _updates_ to total resource or operations was in the `else` 
block previously which will be always executed now.

Dropping.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68362/#review207565
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 15, 2018, 3:53 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68362/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 15, 2018, 3:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Chun-Hung Hsiao.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8403
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8403
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> With the introduction of the resource provider `SUBSCRIBE` event which
> contains the full `ResourceProviderInfo` of a subscribed resource
> provider, we can avoid sending the `ResourceProviderInfo` in
> `UPDATE_STATE` events and instead only send a `ResourceProviderID`
> like in most other messages.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/resource_provider/manager.cpp abd7e38e5517ea600f9fc9b8a96c7d0d26df0620 
>   src/resource_provider/message.hpp 9307f8859035dfafe0952e9026b078b44121537e 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 679394a549cdfe84d64a102164c8652ad96f1eb2 
>   src/tests/resource_provider_manager_tests.cpp 
> 0b9e985cf3b4ded8590615b418e52a2a11f1c1aa 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68362/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to