> On Jan. 25, 2019, 10 a.m., Gilbert Song wrote: > > Mesos is not responsible for packaging, which means that Mesos does not > > provide a default seccomp config. However, it may be hard for many > > operators to figure out a common seccomp profile on Mesos. Could we add a > > recommended seccomp profile in this doc?
The main reason we might not want to provide a default seccomp config here is that it will eventually become outdated. Given that it's a security feature, recommending an outdated profile does not look good to me. - Andrei ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review212317 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 30, 2018, 4:33 p.m., Andrei Budnik wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 30, 2018, 4:33 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, James Peach, and Qian Zhang. > > > Bugs: MESOS-9036 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9036 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/isolators/linux-seccomp.md PRE-CREATION > docs/mesos-containerizer.md d15e82583fa207ba78e9fc1e83da0cf1f469ec4e > docs/upgrades.md e493aefb36ea7b9631af35179938d778dc47442a > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/diff/6/ > > > Testing > ------- > > None: not a functional change. > > > Thanks, > > Andrei Budnik > >