> On Feb. 5, 2019, 5:15 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > src/master/validation.cpp
> > Lines 2577-2579 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/69894/diff/1/?file=2123918#file2123918line2577>
> >
> >     Maybe make this more in line with what we already have for `UNRESERVE` 
> > of persistent volumes?
> >     ```
> >     A disk resource containing a persistent volume {source} cannot be 
> > destroyed directly. Please destroy the persistent volume first then destroy 
> > the disk resource.
> >     ```
> >     Also, spaces either at start or end of line, not mixed. At the start 
> > seems popular.

The line breaking is done by clang-format ;) But I'll follow your suggestion.


- Chun-Hung


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69894/#review212552
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 5, 2019, 7:43 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69894/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 5, 2019, 7:43 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, James DeFelice, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9544
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9544
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> `DESTROY_DISK` would bypass persistent volume cleanup and directly ask
> the CSI plugin to delete the backed volume. Since the CSI spec does not
> require the plugin to do data cleanup, to avoid data leakage, we require
> that if there is persistent volume on the CSI volume, it should be
> destroyed first.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/validation.cpp a71edeb7827b534e27ad3e3398abe555bf36e741 
>   src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp 
> c00e8bb315c28bdf438da2089dd81f5e348982e5 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69894/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao
> 
>

Reply via email to