-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70396/#review214429
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp
Lines 6192-6193 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70396/#comment300627>

    Maybe say we add the framework first to be clear that it's active when 
agent 2 shows up?



src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp
Lines 6194-6195 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70396/#comment300629>

    This seems counter-intuitive, but then I noticed it's explained at the 
bottom of the test, seems to be better explained up here?



src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp
Lines 6241-6245 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70396/#comment300628>

    Weird but yeah, ditto the other comment (probably it makes more sense for 
the reader to pull this up right beneath or integrated into the explananation 
of the test setup?)
    
    Can we also put a TODO that indicates how this test will need to change 
once we have hierarchical quota?


- Benjamin Mahler


On April 5, 2019, 12:37 a.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70396/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 5, 2019, 12:37 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This test ensures that a nested role's allocation is accounted
> to the top-level role's consumed quota.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp 
> c7edee2f49bfac0796c9506265d3bb766416ee63 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70396/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Meng Zhu
> 
>

Reply via email to