-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70591/#review215068
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp
Line 542 (original), 555 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70591/#comment301457>

    s/.../and when there are reservations tied to this role/



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp
Line 543 (original), 556 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70591/#comment301459>

    Calling it `roles`?



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp
Lines 1716 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70591/#comment301460>

    newline below



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp
Line 2119 (original), 2122 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70591/#comment301461>

    Shouldn't this be:
    
    ```
    if (!roles.contains(role) || roles.at(role).frameworks.empty()) {
      ....
    }
    ```



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp
Line 2610 (original), 2614 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70591/#comment301462>

    not yours, but I found this shadowing hurting readibility. Maybe we can 
sneak this fix in?


- Meng Zhu


On May 3, 2019, 8:50 a.m., Andrei Sekretenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70591/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 3, 2019, 8:50 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Meng Zhu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9701
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9701
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch introduces `struct RoleInfo` which contains the framework IDs and 
> reservations tied to the role and replaces `roles` and 
> `reservationScalarQuantities` hashmaps with `hashmap<std::string, RoleInfo>`.
> 
> I personally do not like the name `RoleInfo` and would appreciate any better 
> naming ideas. 
> However, naming this entity `Role` would have been even worse: it would imply 
> using `const Role& role` throughout the code, which would require changing 
> all the places which use `std::string role` as a key...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> c2058baca5159da4cdcab77afd5de3c0d5ae6c48 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> 64a076ddd29711437d539a06bb0470755828cc87 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70591/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> Benchmarking: 5 runs of 
> `BENCHMARK_HierarchicalAllocator_WithQuotaParam.LargeAndSmallQuota/5` with 
> the optimized build.
> 
> Performance impact in this benchmark seems to be negligible.
> 
> BEFORE:
> Added 3000 agents in 51.553929ms
> Added 3000 frameworks in 15.174748344secs
> Benchmark setup: 3000 agents, 3000 roles, 3000 frameworks, with random sorter
> Made 3856 allocations in 12.400805171secs
> Made 0 allocation in 12.5850238secs
> 
> Added 3000 agents in 55.739336ms
> Added 3000 frameworks in 14.730404769secs
> Benchmark setup: 3000 agents, 3000 roles, 3000 frameworks, with random sorter
> Made 3856 allocations in 12.563439682secs
> Made 0 allocation in 13.063555055secs
> 
> Added 3000 agents in 54.414733ms
> Added 3000 frameworks in 15.10136842secs
> Benchmark setup: 3000 agents, 3000 roles, 3000 frameworks, with random sorter
> Made 3856 allocations in 13.501664915secs
> Made 0 allocation in 12.89034382secs
> 
> Added 3000 agents in 52.58252ms
> Added 3000 frameworks in 14.048350298secs
> Benchmark setup: 3000 agents, 3000 roles, 3000 frameworks, with random sorter
> Made 3856 allocations in 12.299952145secs
> Made 0 allocation in 11.888248811secs
> 
> Added 3000 agents in 52.821439ms
> Added 3000 frameworks in 15.344450583secs
> Benchmark setup: 3000 agents, 3000 roles, 3000 frameworks, with random sorter
> Made 3856 allocations in 12.634000025secs
> Made 0 allocation in 12.427171541secs
> 
> 
> AFTER:
> 
> Added 3000 agents in 69.716648ms
> Added 3000 frameworks in 15.249001979secs
> Benchmark setup: 3000 agents, 3000 roles, 3000 frameworks, with random sorter
> Made 3856 allocations in 12.860494226secs
> Made 0 allocation in 12.228866329secs
> 
> Added 3000 agents in 52.639388ms
> Added 3000 frameworks in 15.207895482secs
> Benchmark setup: 3000 agents, 3000 roles, 3000 frameworks, with random sorter
> Made 3856 allocations in 12.504777266secs
> Made 0 allocation in 12.70388062secs
> 
> Added 3000 agents in 56.865794ms
> Added 3000 frameworks in 15.284003915secs
> Benchmark setup: 3000 agents, 3000 roles, 3000 frameworks, with random sorter
> Made 3856 allocations in 13.86859815secs
> Made 0 allocation in 12.538958231secs
> 
> Added 3000 agents in 56.028013ms
> Added 3000 frameworks in 13.892577869secs
> Benchmark setup: 3000 agents, 3000 roles, 3000 frameworks, with random sorter
> Made 3856 allocations in 12.341724418secs
> Made 0 allocation in 12.23022189secs
> 
> Added 3000 agents in 52.368219ms
> Added 3000 frameworks in 13.978581104secs
> Benchmark setup: 3000 agents, 3000 roles, 3000 frameworks, with random sorter
> Made 3856 allocations in 12.701682501secs
> Made 0 allocation in 12.141360313secs
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Sekretenko
> 
>

Reply via email to