-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#review215774
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!




Nice tests, thank you Andrei!


src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 150 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302617>

    s/update/newInfo/



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 150 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302618>

    how about: s/update/newInfo/



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 157-158 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302614>

    This seems a little brittle, as we probably should be failing FrameworkInfo 
validation when there is an UNKNOWN capability. Seems like a bug that it's not 
getting checked
    
    How about REGION_AWARE?



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 164-169 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302615>

    Remove "without_resources"? I'm not sure what it's trying to communicate, 
but it seems to carry too much context from somewhere else, is it named this 
way because of a test?



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 170 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302619>

    newline



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 174 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302620>

    s/std::string/string/ here and below



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 274 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302621>

    As an aside, the error above says "Updating" and this one says "Changing", 
should probably make the language consistent



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 370-375 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302622>

    This looks racy..?
    
    The agent may get added before the subscriber subscribes, in which case the 
AGENT_ADDED event wouldn't be sent because the agent gets included in the 
initial SUBSCRIBE state.



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 493 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302624>

    Why resume and re-pause the clock?



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 512 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302625>

    Why resume?



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 562-565 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302631>

    ```
      Future<Event::Rescind> rescind;
      EXPECT_CALL(*scheduler, rescind(_, _))
        .WillOnce(FutureArg<1>(&rescind));
    ```



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 569-570 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/#comment302629>

    ```
      // TODO(asekretenko): Add a more in-depth check that the
      // allocator does what it should.
    ```


- Benjamin Mahler


On June 3, 2019, 8:14 p.m., Andrei Sekretenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 3, 2019, 8:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7258
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7258
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added tests for the V1 UPDATE_FRAMEWORK call.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am 5f97523fbe2d80733fbdcc7706f2761f5a071f9f 
>   src/tests/CMakeLists.txt e6b1d8a097246f0921467d7f778034d6754fcff6 
>   src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70534/diff/9/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Sekretenko
> 
>

Reply via email to