> On June 20, 2019, 6:36 p.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> > src/common/http.hpp
> > Lines 219-221 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/70877/diff/1/?file=2150637#file2150637line220>
> >
> >     Why the namespace here and below?

It's needed to compile, clang can't seem to match the aapropriate overload 
otherwise


> On June 20, 2019, 6:36 p.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> > src/master/readonly_handler.cpp
> > Line 744 (original), 701 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/70877/diff/1/?file=2150639#file2150639line744>
> >
> >     what is this for?

notice that `master` is used in the lambdas (this is the same style as the 
other jsonify handlers)


> On June 20, 2019, 6:36 p.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> > src/master/readonly_handler.cpp
> > Lines 766-770 (original), 721-736 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/70877/diff/1/?file=2150639#file2150639line768>
> >
> >     Not very important, but I find putting shorter/simpler case on the top 
> > would improve readibilty.

Sounds good


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70877/#review216007
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 18, 2019, 7:13 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70877/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 18, 2019, 7:13 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Meng Zhu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Updated master's /roles endpoint to use jsonify.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/common/http.hpp a0f9b67dca86f7c035035abed5d497aaf759bb10 
>   src/common/http.cpp dcf3cb0234fc81e155dae2267764c1dd7bed5201 
>   src/master/readonly_handler.cpp 66d6160c5e951e6c3a51eb02c31ead066c322202 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70877/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to