-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70923/#review216102
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/registry_operations.cpp
Lines 422-433 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70923/#comment303094>

    I do not see the capability removed anywhere. But in the previous patch, we 
said:
    
    ```
    To remove this minimum capability requirement:
    
    ```
    
    I am OK with not removing any minimum capability (even they are not needed 
anymore). But we should mention that in the doc.


- Meng Zhu


On June 21, 2019, 9 a.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70923/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 21, 2019, 9 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Benjamin Mahler, Greg Mann, and 
> Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9814
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9814
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This adds the associated registry operation and fields for the
> DRAIN_AGENT master call.  This call affects admitted or unreachable
> agents and thus has data fields into two parts of the registry.
> 
> When agents transition from reachable to unreachable, or vice
> versa, the draining info is now copied too.
> 
> Because this feature is not downgrade compatible, a minimum capability
> is added when the draining feature is used.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/registry.proto 239789322c45c6a8346332f50661a98b1851b685 
>   src/master/registry_operations.hpp 5a3010d46c4eddb0d660eb7368ec836903477a9b 
>   src/master/registry_operations.cpp c417c4d6c4272eeab15f5313ca5160d4a0aa4da4 
>   src/tests/registrar_tests.cpp 81979d78f1348791e28f1afea4ca2999de6362b8 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70923/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joseph Wu
> 
>

Reply via email to