-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70916/#review216117
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/master/quota_handler.cpp
Lines 375-379 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70916/#comment303112>

    Is something going to change here that we should document? Some more 
context would be helpful



src/master/quota_handler.cpp
Line 736 (original), 753-755 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70916/#comment303120>

    A bit more context in the comment for the reader would be helpful, e.g. is 
this going to stay as is because a new action type is in place for the new api?



src/master/quota_handler.cpp
Lines 758 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/70916/#comment303111>

    const auto&


- Benjamin Mahler


On June 24, 2019, 10:22 p.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70916/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 24, 2019, 10:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9807
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9807
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This paves way to remove `struct Quota`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp 7acaa8264eb7a37e17394bc4940971f872ab2de3 
>   src/master/master.cpp d15b2d9dbc79e95c15b689f29f88cebb76f94dd8 
>   src/master/quota_handler.cpp 854189cd052cc88b4dc0ade72c63ac9a1b0bcbb5 
>   src/master/readonly_handler.cpp d62f139ed25dc6d03e91f76bf6574ad8c3c6baa0 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70916/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Meng Zhu
> 
>

Reply via email to