> On Aug. 21, 2019, 3:59 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> > src/tests/master_draining_tests.cpp
> > Lines 206 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71315/diff/1/?file=2161829#file2161829line253>
> >
> >     Should we make this value larger? We advance the clock by the agent 
> > reregistration timeout in these tests, which could be large?
> 
> Joseph Wu wrote:
>     I don't think it makes too much of a difference how large or small this 
> value is.  Larger values mean that advancing the clock by this interval may 
> trigger different intervals too.  The tests will need to account for this 
> either way.
>     
>     Note: Later in the chain, I add some clock advances by this value, to 
> test offers after reactivating agents.

kk, sg


- Greg


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71315/#review217355
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 19, 2019, 9:55 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71315/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 19, 2019, 9:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Greg Mann.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9892
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9892
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Tests of this feature will generally require a master, agent, framework,
> and a single task to be launched at the beginning of the test.
> This moves this common code into the test SetUp.
> 
> This also changes the `post(...)` helper to return the http::Response
> object instead of parsing it.  The response for DRAIN_AGENT calls
> does not return an object, so the tests were not checking the
> response before.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_draining_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71315/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joseph Wu
> 
>

Reply via email to