-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71879/#review218973
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





3rdparty/stout/include/stout/path.hpp
Line 154 (original), 154 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71879/#comment306962>

    Ideally we'd still keep a deprecated `absolute()` function around, to not 
break backwards compatibility.
    
    But I'm not sure what our current policy on stout backwards compatibility 
is, if we're regularly doing similar refactorings in stout, feel free to drop 
this issue.


- Benno Evers


On Dec. 5, 2019, 12:48 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71879/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 5, 2019, 12:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benno Evers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-10062
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10062
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Renamed stout's path-related absolute functions to is_absolute.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/internal/windows/longpath.hpp 
> 499eef30a3d16ac1f6c2e3334ef773e91e987a45 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/posix/copyfile.hpp 
> 631babc17fff978b4e2048e5041a9f8db9b282b2 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/copyfile.hpp 
> 34723bce9a151582de481d63a865509d4d29c02c 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/path.hpp 
> ba1f665ce94b9636d88a7ecce8643c56758f7b5c 
>   3rdparty/stout/tests/path_tests.cpp 
> 19dd910a534040468aeb48f15ebdf56dff32bc15 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71879/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to