-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71815/#review219209
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/executor/executor.cpp
Lines 243 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71815/#comment307317>

    Can you introduce a constant for this `108` and the one below? We should 
add documentation where this value comes from to that constant.



src/tests/command_executor_tests.cpp
Lines 511-512 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71815/#comment307318>

    These flags are only present and active later in the chain. If you have 
time you could reorder the patches so we get a clean bisect, but I don't think 
that this is critical.


- Benjamin Bannier


On Jan. 10, 2020, 2:42 a.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71815/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 10, 2020, 2:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Bannier.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-10039
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10039
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added support for the `MESOS_DOMAIN_SOCKET` environment variable
> to the default executor. If this variable is present, the executor
> will use the specified domain socket to connect to the agent,
> as opposed to the IP address encoded in the agent PID.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/executor/executor.cpp dfa58206b65a6827ad4b958879c19a093a672e80 
>   src/launcher/default_executor.cpp 521494a2770192e39b5159624f057e01f2690c8a 
>   src/tests/command_executor_tests.cpp 
> c7f7711a7b085bdacd0f16b16a6c85cc47e2045c 
>   src/tests/default_executor_tests.cpp 
> 49c4e3b37bde848dc7a4fd02a1458c650a84a16f 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71815/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran the new test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benno Evers
> 
>

Reply via email to