----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/75046/#review226536 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/linux/routing/route.cpp Line 99 (original), 99 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/75046/#comment314778> what about this one and the one in diagnosis.cpp? - Benjamin Mahler On June 11, 2024, 10:59 p.m., Jason Zhou wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/75046/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 11, 2024, 10:59 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Previously, when grabbing the destination, we would filter out the default > address at 0.0.0.0/0 by checking that the dst pointer is pointing at an empty > struct. > With newer operating systems, it seems to be possible that the dst pointer > can be pointing at a valid struct that corresponds to 0.0.0.0/0. > To ensure that we are able accurately filter out the default route, we switch > to the libnl function nl_addr_iszero to determine if the nl_addr struct > corresponds to 0.0.0.0/0. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/linux/routing/route.cpp bdf29a9c7090fc9483cd89e68afaa694ef271f57 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/75046/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Jason Zhou > >
