tgravescs opened a new pull request #27313: [SPARK-29148]Add stage level scheduling dynamic allocation and scheduler backend changes URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27313 <!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you: 1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html 2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html 3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'. 4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes. 5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes. 6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review. --> ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? <!-- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below. 1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers. 2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes. 3. If there is design documentation, please add the link. 4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link. --> This is another PR for stage level scheduling. In particular this adds changes to the dynamic allocation manager and the scheduler backend to be able to track what executors are needed per ResourceProfile. Note the api is still private to Spark until the entire feature gets in, so this functionality will be there but only usable by tests for profiles other then the DefaultProfile. The main changes here are simply tracking things on a ResourceProfile basis as well as sending the executor requests to the scheduler backend for all ResourceProfiles. I introduce a ResourceProfileManager in this PR that will track all the actual ResourceProfile objects so that we can keep them all in a single place and just pass around and use in datastructures the resource profile id. The resource profile id can be used with the ResourceProfileManager to get the actual ResourceProfile contents. There are various places in the code that use executor "slots" for things. The ResourceProfile adds functionality to keep that calculation in it. This logic is more complex then it should due to standalone mode and mesos coarse grained not setting the executor cores config. They default to all cores on the worker, so calculating slots is harder there. This PR keeps the functionality to make the cores the limiting resource because the scheduler still uses that for "slots" for a few things. This PR does also add the resource profile id to the Stage and stage info classes to be able to test things easier. That full set of changes will come with the scheduler PR that will be after this one. The PR stops at the scheduler backend pieces for the cluster manager and the real YARN support hasn't been added in this PR, that again will be in a separate PR, so this has a few of the API changes up to the cluster manager and then just uses the default profile requests to continue. The code for the entire feature is here for reference: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27053/files although it needs to be upmerged again as well. ### Why are the changes needed? <!-- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, 1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API. 2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug. --> Needed for stage level scheduling feature. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? <!-- If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible. If no, write 'No'. --> No user facing api changes added here. ### How was this patch tested? <!-- If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible. If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future. If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add. --> Lots of unit tests and manually testing. I tested on yarn, k8s, standalone, local modes. Ran both failure and success cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
