Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4947#discussion_r26041428
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
    @@ -158,7 +158,13 @@ private[spark] class KryoSerializerInstance(ks: 
KryoSerializer) extends Serializ
     
       override def serialize[T: ClassTag](t: T): ByteBuffer = {
         output.clear()
    -    kryo.writeClassAndObject(output, t)
    +    try {
    +      kryo.writeClassAndObject(output, t)
    +    } catch {
    +      case e: KryoException if e.getMessage.startsWith("Buffer overflow") 
=>
    +        throw new SparkException("Serialization failed: Kryo buffer 
overflow. To avoid this, " +
    --- End diff --
    
    The cause stack trace / message would be printed by `printStackTrace`. It 
would not become part of the message from this new `SparkException`. Net-net I 
think it wouldn't hurt to just add additional info to the new `SparkException` 
message if it's deemed useful.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to