HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #28707: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28707#issuecomment-638522162
And I think SPARK-27237 doesn't require a sort of "future-proof" which is preferably be done with a thing with risk - it doesn't touch the existing part of checkpoint and simply put the schema information into a new file. If we find a better way to pack the schema information into the checkpoint, we can simply discard/ignore the file or craft a logic to migrate smoothly. No risk on rolling back in future. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
