agrawaldevesh commented on a change in pull request #29211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29211#discussion_r460421617



##########
File path: 
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend.scala
##########
@@ -277,12 +282,52 @@ private[spark] class CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend(
       if (executor != null) {
         executor.decommission()
       }
-      logInfo("Done decommissioning self.")
+      // Shutdown the executor once all tasks are gone & any configured 
migrations completed.
+      // Detecting migrations completion doesn't need to be perfect and we 
want to minimize the
+      // overhead for executors that are not in decommissioning state as 
overall that will be
+      // more of the executors. For example, this will not catch a block which 
is already in
+      // the process of being put from a remote executor before migration 
starts. This trade-off
+      // is viewed as acceptable to minimize introduction of any new locking 
structures in critical
+      // code paths.
+
+      val shutdownThread = new Thread("wait-for-blocks-to-migrate") {
+        var lastTaskRunningTime = System.nanoTime()
+        val sleep_time = 1000 // 1s
+
+        while (true) {

Review comment:
       NICE CATCH. OMG!!.
   
   @holdenk, I think we should add tests for this :-) 




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to