cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #31921:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31921#discussion_r598471813



##########
File path: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaConverter.scala
##########
@@ -130,13 +130,11 @@ class ParquetToSparkSchemaConverter(
       case INT32 =>
         originalType match {
           case INT_8 => ByteType
-          case INT_16 => ShortType
-          case INT_32 | null => IntegerType
+          case INT_16 | UINT_8 => ShortType
+          case INT_32 | UINT_16 | null => IntegerType
           case DATE => DateType
           case DECIMAL => makeDecimalType(Decimal.MAX_INT_DIGITS)
-          case UINT_8 => typeNotSupported()
-          case UINT_16 => typeNotSupported()
-          case UINT_32 => typeNotSupported()
+          case UINT_32 => LongType

Review comment:
       It's mostly about compatibility. Spark won't have unsigned types, but 
spark should be able to read existing parquet files written by other systems 
that support unsigned types.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to