ulysses-you opened a new pull request #32391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32391


   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error message, please read the 
guideline first:
        https://spark.apache.org/error-message-guidelines.html
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   This PR aims to add a new AQE optimizer rule `DynamicJoinSelection`. Like 
other AQE partition number configs, this rule add a new broadcast threshold 
config `spark.sql.adaptive.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold`.
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   The main idea here is that make join config isolation between normal planner 
and aqe planner which shared the same code path.
   
   Actually we don not very trust using the static stat to consider if it can 
build broadcast hash join. In our experience it's very common that Spark throw 
broadcast timeout or driver side OOM exception when execute a bit large plan. 
And due to braodcast join is not reversed which means if we covert join to 
braodcast hash join at first time, we(AQE) can not optimize it again, so it 
should make sense to decide if we can do broadcast at aqe side using different 
sql config.
   
   In order to achieve this we use a specific join hint in advance during AQE 
framework and then at JoinSelection side it will take and follow the inserted 
hint.
   
   For now we only support select strategy for equi join, and follow this order
   1. mark join as broadcast hash join if possible
   2. mark join as shuffled hash join if possible
   
   Note that, we don't override join strategy if user specifies a join hint.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   Yes, a new config `spark.sql.adaptive.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold` added.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   Add new test.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to