c21 opened a new pull request #32528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32528


   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error message, please read the 
guideline first:
        https://spark.apache.org/error-message-guidelines.html
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   As title. This PR is to add code-gen support for LEFT SEMI sort merge join. 
The main change is to add `semiJoin` code path in 
`SortMergeJoinExec.doProduce()` and introduce `onlyBufferFirstMatchedRow` in 
`SortMergeJoinExec.genScanner()`. The latter is for left semi sort merge join 
without condition. For this kind of query, we don't need to buffer all matched 
rows, but only the first one (this is same as non-code-gen code path). 
   
   Example query:
   
   ```
   val df1 = spark.range(10).select($"id".as("k1"))
   val df2 = spark.range(4).select($"id".as("k2"))
   val oneJoinDF = df1.join(df2.hint("SHUFFLE_MERGE"), $"k1" === $"k2", 
"left_semi")
   ```
   
   Example of generated code for the query:
   
   ```
   == Subtree 5 / 5 (maxMethodCodeSize:302; maxConstantPoolSize:156(0.24% 
used); numInnerClasses:0) ==
   *(5) Project [id#0L AS k1#2L]
   +- *(5) SortMergeJoin [id#0L], [k2#6L], LeftSemi
      :- *(2) Sort [id#0L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
      :  +- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#0L, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#27]
      :     +- *(1) Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=2)
      +- *(4) Sort [k2#6L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
         +- Exchange hashpartitioning(k2#6L, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#33]
            +- *(3) Project [id#4L AS k2#6L]
               +- *(3) Range (0, 4, step=1, splits=2)
   
   Generated code:
   /* 001 */ public Object generate(Object[] references) {
   /* 002 */   return new GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage5(references);
   /* 003 */ }
   /* 004 */
   /* 005 */ // codegenStageId=5
   /* 006 */ final class GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage5 extends 
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator {
   /* 007 */   private Object[] references;
   /* 008 */   private scala.collection.Iterator[] inputs;
   /* 009 */   private scala.collection.Iterator smj_streamedInput_0;
   /* 010 */   private scala.collection.Iterator smj_bufferedInput_0;
   /* 011 */   private InternalRow smj_streamedRow_0;
   /* 012 */   private InternalRow smj_bufferedRow_0;
   /* 013 */   private long smj_value_2;
   /* 014 */   private 
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray smj_matches_0;
   /* 015 */   private long smj_value_3;
   /* 016 */   private 
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.UnsafeRowWriter[] 
smj_mutableStateArray_0 = new 
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.UnsafeRowWriter[2];
   /* 017 */
   /* 018 */   public GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage5(Object[] references) {
   /* 019 */     this.references = references;
   /* 020 */   }
   /* 021 */
   /* 022 */   public void init(int index, scala.collection.Iterator[] inputs) {
   /* 023 */     partitionIndex = index;
   /* 024 */     this.inputs = inputs;
   /* 025 */     smj_streamedInput_0 = inputs[0];
   /* 026 */     smj_bufferedInput_0 = inputs[1];
   /* 027 */
   /* 028 */     smj_matches_0 = new 
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray(1, 2147483647);
   /* 029 */     smj_mutableStateArray_0[0] = new 
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.UnsafeRowWriter(1, 0);
   /* 030 */     smj_mutableStateArray_0[1] = new 
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.UnsafeRowWriter(1, 0);
   /* 031 */
   /* 032 */   }
   /* 033 */
   /* 034 */   private boolean findNextJoinRows(
   /* 035 */     scala.collection.Iterator streamedIter,
   /* 036 */     scala.collection.Iterator bufferedIter) {
   /* 037 */     smj_streamedRow_0 = null;
   /* 038 */     int comp = 0;
   /* 039 */     while (smj_streamedRow_0 == null) {
   /* 040 */       if (!streamedIter.hasNext()) return false;
   /* 041 */       smj_streamedRow_0 = (InternalRow) streamedIter.next();
   /* 042 */       long smj_value_0 = smj_streamedRow_0.getLong(0);
   /* 043 */       if (false) {
   /* 044 */         smj_streamedRow_0 = null;
   /* 045 */         continue;
   /* 046 */
   /* 047 */       }
   /* 048 */       if (!smj_matches_0.isEmpty()) {
   /* 049 */         comp = 0;
   /* 050 */         if (comp == 0) {
   /* 051 */           comp = (smj_value_0 > smj_value_3 ? 1 : smj_value_0 < 
smj_value_3 ? -1 : 0);
   /* 052 */         }
   /* 053 */
   /* 054 */         if (comp == 0) {
   /* 055 */           return true;
   /* 056 */         }
   /* 057 */         smj_matches_0.clear();
   /* 058 */       }
   /* 059 */
   /* 060 */       do {
   /* 061 */         if (smj_bufferedRow_0 == null) {
   /* 062 */           if (!bufferedIter.hasNext()) {
   /* 063 */             smj_value_3 = smj_value_0;
   /* 064 */             return !smj_matches_0.isEmpty();
   /* 065 */           }
   /* 066 */           smj_bufferedRow_0 = (InternalRow) bufferedIter.next();
   /* 067 */           long smj_value_1 = smj_bufferedRow_0.getLong(0);
   /* 068 */           if (false) {
   /* 069 */             smj_bufferedRow_0 = null;
   /* 070 */             continue;
   /* 071 */           }
   /* 072 */           smj_value_2 = smj_value_1;
   /* 073 */         }
   /* 074 */
   /* 075 */         comp = 0;
   /* 076 */         if (comp == 0) {
   /* 077 */           comp = (smj_value_0 > smj_value_2 ? 1 : smj_value_0 < 
smj_value_2 ? -1 : 0);
   /* 078 */         }
   /* 079 */
   /* 080 */         if (comp > 0) {
   /* 081 */           smj_bufferedRow_0 = null;
   /* 082 */         } else if (comp < 0) {
   /* 083 */           if (!smj_matches_0.isEmpty()) {
   /* 084 */             smj_value_3 = smj_value_0;
   /* 085 */             return true;
   /* 086 */           } else {
   /* 087 */             smj_streamedRow_0 = null;
   /* 088 */           }
   /* 089 */         } else {
   /* 090 */           if (smj_matches_0.isEmpty()) {
   /* 091 */             smj_matches_0.add((UnsafeRow) smj_bufferedRow_0);
   /* 092 */           }
   /* 093 */
   /* 094 */           smj_bufferedRow_0 = null;
   /* 095 */         }
   /* 096 */       } while (smj_streamedRow_0 != null);
   /* 097 */     }
   /* 098 */     return false; // unreachable
   /* 099 */   }
   /* 100 */
   /* 101 */   protected void processNext() throws java.io.IOException {
   /* 102 */     while (findNextJoinRows(smj_streamedInput_0, 
smj_bufferedInput_0)) {
   /* 103 */       long smj_value_4 = -1L;
   /* 104 */       smj_value_4 = smj_streamedRow_0.getLong(0);
   /* 105 */       scala.collection.Iterator<UnsafeRow> smj_iterator_0 = 
smj_matches_0.generateIterator();
   /* 106 */       boolean smj_hasOutputRow_0 = false;
   /* 107 */
   /* 108 */       while (!smj_hasOutputRow_0 && smj_iterator_0.hasNext()) {
   /* 109 */         InternalRow smj_bufferedRow_1 = (InternalRow) 
smj_iterator_0.next();
   /* 110 */
   /* 111 */         smj_hasOutputRow_0 = true;
   /* 112 */         ((org.apache.spark.sql.execution.metric.SQLMetric) 
references[0] /* numOutputRows */).add(1);
   /* 113 */
   /* 114 */         // common sub-expressions
   /* 115 */
   /* 116 */         smj_mutableStateArray_0[1].reset();
   /* 117 */
   /* 118 */         smj_mutableStateArray_0[1].write(0, smj_value_4);
   /* 119 */         append((smj_mutableStateArray_0[1].getRow()).copy());
   /* 120 */
   /* 121 */       }
   /* 122 */       if (shouldStop()) return;
   /* 123 */     }
   /* 124 */     ((org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.SortMergeJoinExec) 
references[1] /* plan */).cleanupResources();
   /* 125 */   }
   /* 126 */
   /* 127 */ }
   ```
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   Improve query CPU performance. Test with one query:
   
   ```
    def sortMergeJoin(): Unit = {
       val N = 2 << 20
       codegenBenchmark("left semi sort merge join", N) {
         val df1 = spark.range(N).selectExpr(s"id * 2 as k1")
         val df2 = spark.range(N).selectExpr(s"id * 3 as k2")
         val df = df1.join(df2, col("k1") === col("k2"), "left_semi")
         
assert(df.queryExecution.sparkPlan.find(_.isInstanceOf[SortMergeJoinExec]).isDefined)
         df.noop()
       }
     }
   ```
   
   Seeing 30% of run-time improvement:
   
   ```
   Running benchmark: left semi sort merge join
     Running case: left semi sort merge join code-gen off
     Stopped after 2 iterations, 1369 ms
     Running case: left semi sort merge join code-gen on
     Stopped after 5 iterations, 2743 ms
   
   Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_181-b13 on Mac OS X 10.16
   Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU @ 2.40GHz
   left semi sort merge join:                Best Time(ms)   Avg Time(ms)   
Stdev(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
   
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   left semi sort merge join code-gen off              676            685       
   13          3.1         322.2       1.0X
   left semi sort merge join code-gen on               524            549       
   32          4.0         249.7       1.3X
   ```
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   No.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   Added unit test in `WholeStageCodegenSuite.scala` and 
`ExistenceJoinSuite.scala`.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to