sunchao opened a new pull request #34659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34659


   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the 
guideline first in
        'core/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   This PR adds support for complex types (e.g., list, map, array) for Spark's 
vectorized Parquet reader. In particular, this introduces the following changes:
   1. Added a new class `ParquetColumnVector` which encapsulates all the 
necessary information needed when reading a Parquet column, including the 
`ParquetColumn` for the Parquet column, the repetition & definition levels 
(only allocated for a leaf-node of a complex type), as well as the reader for 
the column. In addition, it also contains logic for assembling nested columnar 
batches, via interpreting Parquet repetition & definition levels. 
   2. Changes are made in `VectorizedParquetRecordReader` to initialize a list 
of `ParquetColumnVector` for the columns read.
   3. `VectorizedColumnReader` now also creates a reader for repetition column. 
Depending on whether maximum repetition level is 0, the batch read is now split 
into two code paths, e.g., `readBatch` versus `readBatchNested`.
   4. Added logic to handle complex type in `VectorizedRleValuesReader`. For 
data types involving only struct or primitive types, it still goes with the old 
`readBatch` method which now also saves definition levels into a vector for 
later assembly. Otherwise, for data types involving array or map, a separate 
code path `readBatchNested` is introduced to handle repetition levels.
   5. Modified `WritableColumnVector` to better support null structs. Currently 
it requires populating null entries to all child vectors when there is a null 
struct, however this will waste space and also doesn't work well with Parquet 
scan. This adds an extra field `structOffsets` which records the mapping from a 
row ID to the position of the row in the child vector, so that child vectors 
will only need to store real null elements.
   This PR also introduced a new flag 
`spark.sql.parquet.enableNestedColumnVectorizedReader` which turns the feature 
on or off. By default it is on to facilitates all the Parquet related test 
coverage.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   Whenever read schema containing complex types, at the moment Spark will 
fallback to the row-based reader in parquet-mr, which is much slower. As 
benchmark shows, by adding support into the vectorized reader, we can get ~15x 
on average speed up on reading struct fields, and ~1.5x when reading array of 
struct and map.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   With the PR Spark should now support reading complex types in its vectorized 
Parquet reader. A new config 
`spark.sql.parquet.enableNestedColumnVectorizedReader` is introduced to turn 
the feature on or off.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   
   Added new unit tests.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to