amaliujia commented on code in PR #38742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38742#discussion_r1029756854


##########
connector/connect/src/main/protobuf/spark/connect/base.proto:
##########
@@ -100,18 +70,135 @@ message AnalyzePlanRequest {
   // logging purposes and will not be interpreted by the server.
   optional string client_type = 4;
 
-  // (Optional) Get the explain string of the plan.
-  Explain explain = 5;
+  repeated AnalysisTask tasks = 5;
+
+  message AnalysisTask {
+    oneof task {

Review Comment:
   Yes that is why I actually find model each of the method as RPC because that 
is more closer to the nature of RPC.



##########
connector/connect/src/main/protobuf/spark/connect/base.proto:
##########
@@ -100,18 +70,135 @@ message AnalyzePlanRequest {
   // logging purposes and will not be interpreted by the server.
   optional string client_type = 4;
 
-  // (Optional) Get the explain string of the plan.
-  Explain explain = 5;
+  repeated AnalysisTask tasks = 5;
+
+  message AnalysisTask {
+    oneof task {

Review Comment:
   Yes that is why I actually wanted to model each of the Catalog method as RPC 
because that is more closer to the nature of RPC.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to