wForget opened a new pull request, #47224:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/47224

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the 
guideline first in
        'common/utils/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   
   Eagerly execute union multi commands together.
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   MultiInsert is split to multiple sql executions, resulting in no exchange 
reuse.
   
   Reproduce sql:
   
   ```
   create table wangzhen_t1(c1 int);
   create table wangzhen_t2(c1 int);
   
   create table wangzhen_t3(c1 int);from (select /*+ REPARTITION(3) */ c1 from 
wangzhen_t1)
   insert overwrite table wangzhen_t2 select c1
   insert overwrite table wangzhen_t3 select c1; 
   ```
   
   In Spark 3.1, there is only one SQL execution and there is a reuse exchange.
   
   
![image](https://github.com/apache/spark/assets/17894939/5ff68392-aaa8-4e6b-8cac-1687880796b9)
   
   However, in Spark 3.5, it was split to multiple executions and there was no 
ReuseExchange.
   
   
![image](https://github.com/apache/spark/assets/17894939/3cb9475c-71ea-4a84-aa40-ab3c5e2c68e2)
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   yes,  multi  inserts will executed in one execution.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   added unit test
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   
   No
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to