Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#discussion_r31402037
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
    @@ -261,14 +270,19 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
       private def updateAndSyncNumExecutorsTarget(now: Long): Int = 
synchronized {
         val maxNeeded = maxNumExecutorsNeeded
     
    -    if (maxNeeded < numExecutorsTarget) {
    +    if (initializing && (maxNeeded < numExecutorsTarget)) {
    +      // when ExecutorAllocationManager is still in initializing status,
    +      // and the max number of needed executors is less than the initial 
number of executors,
    +      // we just return without doing anything.
    +      0
    +    } else if (!initializing && maxNeeded < numExecutorsTarget) {
           // The target number exceeds the number we actually need, so stop 
adding new
           // executors and inform the cluster manager to cancel the extra 
pending requests
           val oldNumExecutorsTarget = numExecutorsTarget
           numExecutorsTarget = math.max(maxNeeded, minNumExecutors)
           client.requestTotalExecutors(numExecutorsTarget)
           numExecutorsToAdd = 1
    -      logInfo(s"Lowering target number of executors to $numExecutorsTarget 
because " +
    +      logDebug(s"Lowering target number of executors to 
$numExecutorsTarget because " +
    --- End diff --
    
    This is a little verbose, so change to `logDebug`.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to