Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6587#issuecomment-108171706
I agree this change can make things simple and actually I have tried to do
it before... But think about `AttributeReference.withName`, it won't have
effect as the tree node library will regard it as no-change and still keep the
old tree. If `AttributeReference` should not care about the `name`, then we
need to figure out why we need `AttributeReference.withName`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
