Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#discussion_r32286339
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/akka/AkkaRpcEnvSuite.scala ---
    @@ -47,4 +56,60 @@ class AkkaRpcEnvSuite extends RpcEnvSuite {
         }
       }
     
    +  test("timeout on ask Future with RpcTimeout") {
    +
    +    class EchoActor(sleepDuration: Long) extends Actor {
    +      def receive: Receive = {
    +        case msg =>
    +          Thread.sleep(sleepDuration)
    +          sender() ! msg
    +      }
    +    }
    +
    +    val system = ActorSystem("EchoSystem")
    +    val echoActor = system.actorOf(Props(new EchoActor(0)), name = "echo")
    +    val sleepyActor = system.actorOf(Props(new EchoActor(50)), name = 
"sleepy")
    +
    +    val shortProp = "spark.rpc.short.timeout"
    +    val timeout = new RpcTimeout(10 millis, shortProp)
    +
    +    try {
    +
    +      // Ask with immediate response
    +      var fut = echoActor.ask("hello")(timeout.duration).mapTo[String].
    +        recover(timeout.addMessageIfTimeout)
    +
    +      // This should complete successfully
    +      val result = timeout.awaitResult(fut)
    +
    +      assert(result.nonEmpty)
    +
    +      // Ask with delayed response
    +      fut = sleepyActor.ask("goodbye")(timeout.duration).mapTo[String].
    +        recover(timeout.addMessageIfTimeout)
    +
    +      // Allow future to complete with failure using plain Await.result, 
this will return
    +      // once the future is complete
    +      val msg1 =
    +        intercept[RpcTimeoutException] {
    +          Await.result(fut, 200 millis)
    +        }.getMessage()
    +
    +      assert(msg1.contains(shortProp))
    +
    +      // Use RpcTimeout.awaitResult to process Future, since it has 
already failed with
    +      // RpcTimeoutException, the same exception should be thrown
    +      val msg2 =
    +        intercept[RpcTimeoutException] {
    +          timeout.awaitResult(fut)
    +        }.getMessage()
    --- End diff --
    
    yeah you're right, I hadn't thought about that case when I mentioned this 
... but another test doesn't hurt :)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to