HwangDongJun commented on code in PR #58187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/58187#discussion_r4163597553


##########
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/submit/KubernetesClientApplication.scala:
##########
@@ -136,43 +188,75 @@ private[spark] class Client(
     val driverPodName = resolvedDriverPod.getMetadata.getName
 
     // setup resources before pod creation
-    val preKubernetesResources = 
resolvedDriverSpec.driverPreKubernetesResources
-    try {
-      kubernetesClient.resourceList(preKubernetesResources: 
_*).forceConflicts().serverSideApply()
-    } catch {
-      case NonFatal(e) =>
-        logError("Please check \"kubectl auth can-i create [resource]\" 
first." +
-          " It should be yes. And please also check your feature step 
implementation.")
-        kubernetesClient.resourceList(preKubernetesResources: _*).delete()
-        throw e
-    }
+    // SPARK-38079: the driver's own base config map (mounted as 
SPARK_CONF_VOLUME_DRIVER
+    // above) must also be created before the pod itself, to avoid a 
"configmap ... not
+    // found" mount race between the driver pod and the config map it depends 
on.
+    val preKubernetesResources = 
resolvedDriverSpec.driverPreKubernetesResources ++ Seq(configMap)
+
+    // SPARK-38079: some of the pre-resources above (e.g. the Kerberos 
keytab/delegation token
+    // secrets, the driver Kubernetes credentials secret) carry credentials. 
They are created
+    // here without an owner reference -- the owner reference is only added 
once the driver pod
+    // exists (see "Refresh all pre-resources' owner references" below), since 
Kubernetes owner
+    // references require the owner's UID, which does not exist before the pod 
is created. If
+    // this process is terminated abruptly in that window (e.g. Ctrl-C, 
SIGTERM, or a fatal JVM
+    // error), the pre-resources would otherwise be silently orphaned in the 
namespace forever,
+    // since Kubernetes only garbage-collects via owner references. This 
shutdown hook makes a
+    // best-effort attempt to delete them (and the driver pod, if this 
submission created it) in
+    // that case. It is a no-op -- and removed entirely, see the `finally` 
below -- once the
+    // owner-reference refresh has completed; from that point on the existing 
owner references
+    // make normal Kubernetes garbage collection sufficient, and e.g. Ctrl-C 
while waiting for
+    // the application to complete must keep today's behavior of just 
detaching.
+    val preResourcesApplied = new AtomicBoolean(false)
+    val podCreatedByUs = new AtomicBoolean(false)
+    val cleanupHookRef = shutdownHookOps.addHook(() => 
cleanupOrphanedPreResources(

Review Comment:
   Took the direction you suggested in the prior review — the shutdown hook is 
gone entirely, replaced by `spec.schedulingGates` (see [the reply 
above](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/58187#discussion_r4129910563)), 
rather than trying to patch its coverage gaps.
   
   This also addresses the size/benefit imbalance you point out: the whole hook 
mechanism (and the SIGKILL/OOM/double-failure cases it never covered anyway) is 
replaced by a much smaller mechanism, where the worst case left uncovered is a 
harmless gated pod rather than an ownerless credential-bearing resource (see 
[the finally/shutdown-hook reply 
above](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/58187#discussion_r4129910495)).
   
   On the PR description: you're right, it's stale on all three points (the 
`VolcanoFeatureStep` claim, no mention of the mechanism actually used, and the 
test count). I'll rewrite it to match the current design.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to