Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6990#discussion_r33362694 --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala --- @@ -833,8 +833,10 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager( logDebug("Put block %s locally took %s".format(blockId, Utils.getUsedTimeMs(startTimeMs))) // Either we're storing bytes and we asynchronously started replication, or we're storing - // values and need to serialize and replicate them now: - if (putLevel.replication > 1) { + // values and need to serialize and replicate them now. + // Should not replicate the block if its StorageLevel is StorageLevel.NONE or + // putting it to local is failed. + if (!putBlockInfo.isFailed && putLevel.replication > 1) { --- End diff -- yes, now i understand. when Block is received but memoryStore does not have enough memory, so Block is Failed in local. block's memory have been requested before putting to memoryStore and then memoryStore will check whether number of its memory has enough than block size. number of its memory is from memoryFraction, but now JVM maybe have enough memory and can create any object.
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org