Github user dibbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6990#discussion_r33652840 --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala --- @@ -833,8 +833,10 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager( logDebug("Put block %s locally took %s".format(blockId, Utils.getUsedTimeMs(startTimeMs))) // Either we're storing bytes and we asynchronously started replication, or we're storing - // values and need to serialize and replicate them now: - if (putLevel.replication > 1) { + // values and need to serialize and replicate them now. + // Should not replicate the block if its StorageLevel is StorageLevel.NONE or + // putting it to local is failed. + if (!putBlockInfo.isFailed && putLevel.replication > 1) { --- End diff -- Also as I see the replicate process, if one remote peer is failed to replicate , it tries with other remote peer to get desired Replication factor 2, so the retry mechanism to replicate block already in place. Thus if store to local is failed and if we stop replication to happen, this gives higher chance for client to retry same block and get desired replication factor .
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org