Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6457#issuecomment-141535317
  
    Hi @zsxwing,
    
    There were a couple of things that were bothering me in the code but I 
couldn't really put my finger on them. Instead of trying to point them out in 
comments, I played a little with your code and made changes to it.
    
    - thread-safety: 
https://github.com/vanzin/spark/commit/ea62714d32c764957c8bb6fa13fbd46b312f9538
    
    This follows up on my "using AtomicInteger" comments. The 
synchronization-based code had at least a couple of races in it; my changes 
avoid using synchronization in `Inbox` and fix those races too.
    
    - too many maps: 
https://github.com/vanzin/spark/commit/e6674673518ef95cc20c5f0d0f113ce6711b7917
    
    I think this looks a little bit cleaner and is easier to follow than the 
previous code. There are some changes here, particular to the tests, that 
should actually be part of the previous commit.
    
    
    Could you take a look at those and  see what you think? There's some 
synchronization code in `Dispatcher` also that I didn't try to remove; it 
didn't seem necessary to do that at this point, since that would be mostly for 
performance reasons.
    



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to