Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9276#discussion_r43577893
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExchangeCoordinator.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.sql.execution
    +
    +import java.util.{Map => JMap, HashMap => JHashMap}
    +
    +import scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
    +
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.physical.HashPartitioning
    +import org.apache.spark.{Logging, SimpleFutureAction, ShuffleDependency, 
MapOutputStatistics}
    +import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.InternalRow
    +
    +/**
    + * A coordinator used to determines how we shuffle data between stages 
generated by Spark SQL.
    + * Right now, the work of this coordinator is to determine the number of 
post-shuffle partitions
    + * for a stage that needs to fetch shuffle data from one or multiple 
stages.
    + *
    + * A coordinator is constructed with two parameters, `numExchanges` and
    + * `targetPostShuffleInputSize`. `numExchanges` is used to indicated that 
how many [[Exchange]]s
    + * that will be registered to this coordinator. So, when we start to do 
any actual work, we have
    + * a way to make sure that we have got expected number of [[Exchange]]s.
    + * `targetPostShuffleInputSize` is the targeted size of a post-shuffle 
partition's input data size.
    + * With this parameter, we can estimate the number of post-shuffle 
partitions. This parameter
    + * is configured through 
`spark.sql.adaptive.shuffle.targetPostShuffleInputSize`.
    + *
    + * The workflow of this coordinator is described as follows:
    + *  - Before the execution of a [[SparkPlan]], for an [[Exchange]] 
operator,
    + *    if an [[ExchangeCoordinator]] is assigned to it, it registers itself 
to this coordinator.
    + *    This happens in the `doPrepare` method.
    + *  - Once we start to execute a physical plan, an [[Exchange]] registered 
to this coordinator will
    + *    call `postShuffleRDD` to get its corresponding post-shuffle [[RDD]]. 
If this coordinator has
    + *    made the decision on how to shuffle data, this [[Exchange]] will 
immediately get its
    + *    corresponding post-shuffle [[RDD]].
    + *  - If this coordinator has not made the decision on how to shuffle 
data, it will ask those
    + *    registered [[Exchange]]s to submit their pre-shuffle stages. Then, 
based on the the size
    + *    statistics of pre-shuffle partitions, this coordinator will 
determine the number of
    + *    post-shuffle partitions and pack multiple pre-shuffle partitions 
with continuous indices
    + *    to a post-shuffle partition whenever necessary.
    + *  - Finally, this coordinator will create post-shuffle [[RDD]]s for all 
registered [[Exchange]]s.
    + *    So, when an [[Exchange]] calls `postShuffleRDD`, this coordinator 
can lookup the
    + *    corresponding [[RDD]].
    + *
    + * The strategy used to determine the number of post-shuffle partitions is 
described as follows.
    + * To determine the number of post-shuffle partitions, we have a target 
input size for a
    + * post-shuffle partition. Once we have size statistics of pre-shuffle 
partitions from stages
    + * corresponding to the registered [[Exchange]]s, we will do a pass of 
those statistics and
    + * pack pre-shuffle partitions with continuous indices to a single 
post-shuffle partition until
    + * the size of a post-shuffle partition is equal or greater than the 
target size.
    + * For example, we have two stages with the following pre-shuffle 
partition size statistics:
    + * stage 1: [100 MB, 20 MB, 100 MB, 10MB, 30 MB]
    + * stage 2: [10 MB,  10 MB, 70 MB,  5 MB, 5 MB]
    + * assuming the target input size is 128 MB, we will have three 
post-shuffle partitions,
    + * which are:
    + *  - post-shuffle partition 0: pre-shuffle partition 0 and 1
    + *  - post-shuffle partition 1: pre-shuffle partition 2
    + *  - post-shuffle partition 2: pre-shuffle partition 3 and 4
    + *
    + * If `minNumPostShufflePartitions` is defined. This ExchangeCoordinator 
will try to enforce
    + * the minimal number of post-shuffle partitions to this number.
    + */
    +private[sql] class ExchangeCoordinator(
    +    numExchanges: Int,
    +    advisoryTargetPostShuffleInputSize: Long,
    +    minNumPostShufflePartitions: Option[Int] = None)
    +  extends Logging {
    +
    +  // The registered Exchange operators.
    +  private[this] val exchanges = ArrayBuffer[Exchange]()
    +
    +  // This map that is used to lookup the post-shuffle RDD for an Exchange 
operator.
    +  private[this] val postShuffleRDDs: JMap[Exchange, ShuffledRowRDD] =
    +    new JHashMap[Exchange, ShuffledRowRDD](numExchanges)
    +
    +  // A boolean indicates if this coordinator has made decision on how to 
shuffle data.
    +  @volatile private[this] var estimated: Boolean = false
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Registers an [[Exchange]] operator to this coordinator. This method 
is only allowed to be
    +   * called in the `doPrepare` method of an [[Exchange]] operator.
    +   */
    +  def registerExchange(exchange: Exchange): Unit = synchronized {
    +    exchanges += exchange
    +  }
    +
    +  def isEstimated: Boolean = estimated
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Estimates partition start indices for post-shuffle partitions based on
    +   * mapOutputStatistics provided by all pre-shuffle stages.
    +   */
    +  private[sql] def estimatePartitionStartIndices(
    +      mapOutputStatistics: Array[MapOutputStatistics]): Array[Int] = {
    +    // At here, we have mapOutputStatistics.length <= numExchange, it is 
because we do not submit
    +    // a stage if the number of partitions of the RDD is 0.
    +    require(mapOutputStatistics.length <= numExchanges)
    +
    +    // Make sure we do get the same number of pre-shuffle partitions for 
those stages.
    +    val distinctNumPreShufflePartitions =
    +      mapOutputStatistics.map(stats => 
stats.bytesByPartitionId.length).distinct
    +    require(
    +      distinctNumPreShufflePartitions.length == 1,
    +      "There should be only one distinct value of the number pre-shuffle 
partitions " +
    +        "among registered Exchange operator.")
    +
    +    val numPreShufflePartitions = distinctNumPreShufflePartitions.head
    +    val partitionStartIndices = ArrayBuffer[Int]()
    +    var postShuffleInputSize = 0L
    +
    +    // If minNumPostShufflePartitions is defined, it is possible that we 
need to use a
    +    // value less than advisoryTargetPostShuffleInputSize as the target 
input size of
    +    // a post shuffle task.
    +    val targetPostShuffleInputSize = minNumPostShufflePartitions match {
    +      case Some(numPartitions) =>
    +        val totalPostShuffleInputSize = 
mapOutputStatistics.map(_.bytesByPartitionId.sum).sum
    +        // The max at here is to make sure that when we have an empty 
table, we
    +        // only have a single post-shuffle partition.
    +        val maxPostShuffleInputSize =
    +          math.max(math.ceil(totalPostShuffleInputSize / 
numPartitions.toDouble).toLong, 16)
    +        math.min(maxPostShuffleInputSize, 
advisoryTargetPostShuffleInputSize)
    +
    +      case None => advisoryTargetPostShuffleInputSize
    +    }
    +
    +    logInfo(
    +      s"advisoryTargetPostShuffleInputSize: 
$advisoryTargetPostShuffleInputSize, " +
    +      s"targetPostShuffleInputSize $targetPostShuffleInputSize.")
    +
    +    // The first element of partitionStartIndices is always 0.
    +    partitionStartIndices += 0
    +
    +    var i = 0
    +    while (i < numPreShufflePartitions) {
    +      // We calculate the total size of ith pre-shuffle partitions from 
all pre-shuffle stages.
    +      // Then, we add the total size to postShuffleInputSize.
    +      var j = 0
    +      while (j < mapOutputStatistics.length) {
    +        postShuffleInputSize += 
mapOutputStatistics(j).bytesByPartitionId(i)
    +        j += 1
    +      }
    +
    +      // If the current postShuffleInputSize is equal or greater than the
    +      // targetPostShuffleInputSize, We need to add a new element in 
partitionStartIndices.
    +      if (postShuffleInputSize >= targetPostShuffleInputSize) {
    +        if (i < numPreShufflePartitions - 1) {
    +          // Next start index.
    +          partitionStartIndices += i + 1
    +        } else {
    +          // This is the last element. So, we do not need to append the 
next start index to
    +          // partitionStartIndices.
    +        }
    +        // reset postShuffleInputSize.
    +        postShuffleInputSize = 0L
    +      }
    +
    +      i += 1
    +    }
    +
    +    partitionStartIndices.toArray
    +  }
    +
    +  private def doEstimationIfNecessary(): Unit = {
    +    if (!estimated) {
    +      // Make sure we have the expected number of registered Exchange 
operators.
    +      require(exchanges.length == numExchanges)
    +
    +      val newPostShuffleRDDs = new JHashMap[Exchange, 
ShuffledRowRDD](numExchanges)
    +
    +      // Submit all map stages
    +      val shuffleDependencies = ArrayBuffer[ShuffleDependency[Int, 
InternalRow, InternalRow]]()
    +      val submittedStageFutures = 
ArrayBuffer[SimpleFutureAction[MapOutputStatistics]]()
    +      var i = 0
    +      while (i < numExchanges) {
    +        val exchange = exchanges(i)
    +        val shuffleDependency = exchange.prepareShuffleDependency()
    +        shuffleDependencies += shuffleDependency
    +        if (shuffleDependency.rdd.partitions.length != 0) {
    +          // submitMapStage does not accept RDD with 0 partition.
    +          // So, we will not submit this dependency.
    +          submittedStageFutures +=
    +            
exchange.sqlContext.sparkContext.submitMapStage(shuffleDependency)
    +        }
    +        i += 1
    +      }
    +
    +      // Wait for the finishes of those submitted map stages.
    +      val mapOutputStatistics = new 
Array[MapOutputStatistics](submittedStageFutures.length)
    +      i = 0
    +      while (i < submittedStageFutures.length) {
    +        // This call is a blocking call. If the stage has not finished, we 
will wait at here.
    +        mapOutputStatistics(i) = submittedStageFutures(i).get()
    +        i += 1
    +      }
    +
    +      // Now, we estimate partitionStartIndices. 
partitionStartIndices.length will be the
    +      // number of post-shuffle partitions.
    +      val partitionStartIndices =
    +        if (mapOutputStatistics.length == 0) {
    +          None
    +        } else {
    +          Some(estimatePartitionStartIndices(mapOutputStatistics))
    +        }
    +
    +      i = 0
    +      while (i < numExchanges) {
    +        val exchange = exchanges(i)
    +        val rdd =
    +          exchange.preparePostShuffleRDD(shuffleDependencies(i), 
partitionStartIndices)
    +        newPostShuffleRDDs.put(exchange, rdd)
    +
    +        i += 1
    +      }
    +
    +      // Finally, we acquire a lock and set newPostShuffleRDDs and 
estimated.
    +      this.synchronized {
    --- End diff --
    
    After second thought, I think it makes sense to just use the synchronized 
to guard the entire method. The code will be easier to understand.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to