Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#discussion_r51229062
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
    @@ -248,9 +248,7 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf: 
SparkConf, clock: Clock)
           val logInfos: Seq[FileStatus] = statusList
             .filter { entry =>
               try {
    -            getModificationTime(entry).map { time =>
    -              time >= lastScanTime
    -            }.getOrElse(false)
    +            entry.getModificationTime() >= lastScanTime
    --- End diff --
    
    That's a great point, thank you for bringing that up.
    I wasn't sure if filtering out directory here was too early, and instead 
should pass it on and let `EventLoggingListener.openEventLog` decide if it was 
valid (directory would not be).
    For now I add the check.
    
    Also perhaps we should pass a Filter to `fs.listStatus` if the file naming 
convention is known (again assuming we want `checkForLogs` as the gatekeeper as 
above).
    
    And I'm pretty sure it no longer throws AcessControlException on [line 
253](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860/files#diff-a7befb99e7bd7e3ab5c46c2568aa5b3eR253)
 since `listStatus` is not getting called in that path.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to