Github user latioswang commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#discussion_r56683625
  
    --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
    @@ -118,63 +120,94 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
     
         val proc = pb.start()
         val env = SparkEnv.get
    +    val childThreadException = new AtomicReference[Throwable](null)
     
         // Start a thread to print the process's stderr to ours
    -    new Thread("stderr reader for " + command) {
    -      override def run() {
    -        for (line <- Source.fromInputStream(proc.getErrorStream).getLines) 
{
    -          // scalastyle:off println
    -          System.err.println(line)
    -          // scalastyle:on println
    +    new Thread(s"stderr reader for $command") {
    +      override def run(): Unit = {
    +        val err = proc.getErrorStream
    +        try {
    +          for (line <- Source.fromInputStream(err).getLines) {
    +            // scalastyle:off println
    +            System.err.println(line)
    +            // scalastyle:on println
    +          }
    +        } catch {
    +          case t: Throwable => childThreadException.set(t)
    +        } finally {
    +          err.close()
             }
           }
         }.start()
     
         // Start a thread to feed the process input from our parent's iterator
    -    new Thread("stdin writer for " + command) {
    -      override def run() {
    +    new Thread(s"stdin writer for $command") {
    +      override def run(): Unit = {
             TaskContext.setTaskContext(context)
             val out = new PrintWriter(proc.getOutputStream)
    -
    -        // scalastyle:off println
    -        // input the pipe context firstly
    -        if (printPipeContext != null) {
    -          printPipeContext(out.println(_))
    -        }
    -        for (elem <- firstParent[T].iterator(split, context)) {
    -          if (printRDDElement != null) {
    -            printRDDElement(elem, out.println(_))
    -          } else {
    -            out.println(elem)
    +        try {
    +          // scalastyle:off println
    +          // input the pipe context firstly
    +          if (printPipeContext != null) {
    +            printPipeContext(out.println)
    +          }
    +          for (elem <- firstParent[T].iterator(split, context)) {
    +            if (printRDDElement != null) {
    +              printRDDElement(elem, out.println)
    +            } else {
    +              out.println(elem)
    +            }
               }
    +          // scalastyle:on println
    +        } catch {
    +          case t: Throwable => childThreadException.set(t)
    +        } finally {
    +          out.close()
    --- End diff --
    
    ah. i see..  `process.destroy`  is not deprecated :)
    But still closing the output signals `success` to the child process, which 
should not happen when the input stream process hit some exception. I've seen 
hit the problem of my subprocess generating a partial output file and commit 
due to this behavior.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to