Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11327#discussion_r61801165
  
    --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/CoalescedRDD.scala ---
    @@ -334,8 +332,41 @@ private class DefaultPartitionCoalescer(val 
balanceSlack: Double = 0.10)
             }
           }
         } else {
    +      // It is possible to have unionRDD where one rdd has preferred 
locations and another rdd
    +      // that doesn't. To make sure we end up with the requested number of 
partitions,
    +      // make sure to put a partition in every group.
    +
    +      if (groupArr.size > initialHash.size) {
    +        // we don't have a partition assigned to every group yet so first 
try to fill them
    +        // with the partitions with preferred locations
    +        val partIter = partitionLocs.partsWithLocs.iterator
    +        while (partIter.hasNext && initialHash.size < groupArr.size) {
    +          var (nxt_replica, nxt_part) = partIter.next()
    +          if (!initialHash.contains(nxt_part)) {
    +            groupArr.find(pg => pg.numPartitions == 0).map(firstEmpty => {
    --- End diff --
    
    same here


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to